Wireless Communication Techniques in Agricultural Mobile Robots: An Expert Review of Architectures and Performance Trade-offs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
Precision AgricultureAbstract
The integration of autonomous mobile robots (Agri-Robots) is critical for addressing global food security challenges and increasing efficiency in precision agriculture (PA). The operational efficacy of these robots, which perform tasks from planting to harvesting, hinges entirely on robust, high-speed, and low-latency wireless communication. This review analyzes the performance trade-offs among short-range (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee) and wide-area (LoRaWAN, 4G, 5G-SA) technologies, classifying their suitability based on key metrics: Massive Machine-Type Communications (mMTC) for sensing, Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) for control, and Enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) for data offload. Findings indicate that a single standard is insufficient; LoRaWAN excels in long-range, low-power sensing, while private 5G-SA is mandatory for safety-critical, low-latency control. Operational success is inhibited by environmental factors, such as vegetation-induced signal attenuation and systemic issues, including market fragmentation and proprietary data ecosystems. The critical pathway forward involves adopting hybrid network architectures that intelligently combine Low-Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite services for ubiquitous geographic coverage with terrestrial 5G/Wi-Fi for high-throughput edge computing. Further advancements depend on the development of AI-driven autonomous network management and the adoption of lightweight application protocols like CoAP.
References
Aldhaheri, L. (n.d.). Experimental analysis for comparison of wireless transmission technologies: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, Zigbee and LoRa for mobile multi-robot in hostile sites. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Chen, H., et al. (2024). Development of CoAP protocol for communication in mobile robotic systems using IoT technique. PMC.
Chen, T., et al. (2024). Wireless communication techniques in agricultural Mobile Robots: A review. MDPI.
Dames, H., et al. (2023). 5G on the Farm: Evaluating Wireless Network Capabilities and Needs for Agricultural Robotics. ResearchGate.
Deng, P., et al. (2023). Signal attenuation and environmental factors on LoRa sensor node performance. MDPI.
Farm Foundation. (2021). Data Interoperability.
García, J., et al. (2021). Interoperability Challenges and Solutions in Multi-Vendor IoT Ecosystems for Agriculture. ResearchGate.
Ghassemi, G., et al. (2021). Wireless Communications for Internet of Farming: An Early 5G Measurement Study. MDPI.
Huang, X., et al. (2023). A novel physical layer architecture for cognitive radio based on cognition, cooperation, and cognitive interference avoidance. Purdue University.
Iridium. (n.d.). Agribusiness.
Jawad, T., et al. (2017). Wireless architectures. PMC.
Loems, A. (2017). Monitoring and mapping with robot swarms for agricultural applications. IEEE.
Mouser Electronics. (n.d.). EMC issues in robotics and automation.
NRTC. (2024). Barriers beyond connectivity stand in front of precision ag.
Nunez, C. (2024). AI-driven resource allocation scheme. ResearchGate.
Pajic, M., et al. (2022). Measurement of latency during real-time wireless video transmission for remote supervision of autonomous agricultural machines. ResearchGate.
Ribeiro, P., et al. (2023). LoRa BER, Zigbee BER and 5G SS-RSRQ. MDPI.
Singh, S., et. al. (n.d.). Swarm Robotics and Multi-Agent Systems in Agriculture. ResearchGate.
Swissbit. (n.d.). Powering autonomous agriculture: Rugged SSDs for real-time data processing.
TechUK. (2024). Converging need: Satellite connectivity for the agri-tech industry.
Tektelic. (n.d.). LoRaWAN vs. Zigbee: A Comprehensive Comparison.
Wang, R., et al. (2024). Future trends in wireless communication. MDPI.
Wang, X., et al. (2023). Swarm Robotics and Multi-Agent Systems in Agriculture. ResearchGate.
Wu, J., et al. (2024). Cognitive radio sensor network based on IEEE 802.11af technology. IEEE.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 AINTELIA Science Notes Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Aintelia® Science Notes Journal (ASNJ).
By submitting their work, authors agree to the following terms:
-
Copyright Transfer: Copyright of the published article is transferred to Aintelia® Science Notes Journal. The journal reserves the right to publish, reproduce, distribute, and archive the work.
-
Licensing: While the journal retains the copyright, the article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This allows third parties to share and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work and the journal are properly cited.
-
Author Rights: Authors retain the right to use their article for their own scholarly needs, such as including it in a thesis or dissertation, presenting it at conferences, or distributing it to students for educational purposes, provided that the journal is cited as the original publisher.






